Magic Master vs. LANDR vs. eMastered — Comparing AI Mastering Services
Magic Master vs. LANDR vs. eMastered — Which Is Best?
Comparison table
| Feature | Magic Master | LANDR | eMastered | CloudBounce |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (month) | Free / Pro $5 | from $9/mo | from $14/mo | from $9/mo |
| Free plan | ✅ 3 tracks/day | ❌ Demo only | ❌ 1 track | ❌ Trial |
| AI recommendations | ✅ DeepSeek GPT | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Multi-genre presets | ✅ 17 styles | ✅ 3 styles | ✅ 4 styles | ✅ 3 styles |
| Custom chain | ✅ Drag & drop | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| LUFS analyzer | ✅ Free | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| A/B comparison | ✅ Built-in | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Batch processing | ✅ Up to 10 files | ✅ (Pro) | ❌ | ❌ |
| WAV/MP3/FLAC export | ✅ + AAC, Opus | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| True Peak control | ✅ ITU-R BS.1770-5 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Reference mastering | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Telegram bot | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Developer API | ✅ | ✅ (Pro) | ❌ | ❌ |
| Speed (30-sec track) | ~15 sec | ~20 sec | ~25 sec | ~20 sec |
Sound quality
Magic Master
- 10-stage pipeline: DC → EQ → Dynamics → Maximizer → Exciter → Imager → Reverb
- Linkwitz-Riley crossovers (flat summation at the crossover frequency)
- Adaptive LUFS compensation (crest-factor-aware)
- 5 limiter algorithms (brickwall, soft_knee, lookahead, transient_aware, irc_smooth)
- Sub-harmonic synthesis for EDM/trap
- Dynamic EQ (8-band transparent resonance control)
LANDR
- 3 styles (Warm, Balanced, Open)
- Automatic EQ and compression
- Peak-aware limiter
- No chain customization
eMastered
- 4 styles (Balanced, Warm, Bright, Punch)
- Reference mastering (matching a reference track)
- EQ matching
- No multiband dynamics
Pricing
| Plan | Magic Master | LANDR | eMastered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 3 tracks/day, all features | Demo (watermarked) | 1 track |
| Pro | $5/mo | $9/mo | $14/mo |
| Studio | $14/mo | $25/mo | $39/mo |
| Annual | $50/$105 | $90/$250 | $140/$390 |
Magic Master Pro costs half of LANDR and a third of eMastered, with more features.
Who is each service for?
Magic Master
- ✅ Musicians and producers (all genres)
- ✅ Podcasters
- ✅ AI music creators (Suno, Udio)
- ✅ Developers (API)
- ✅ Anyone who wants control over the process
LANDR
- ✅ Fast mastering with zero setup
- ✅ Music distribution (built in)
- ❌ Limited customization
eMastered
- ✅ Reference mastering (matching a reference track)
- ✅ Simple interface
- ❌ More expensive than competitors
Test: before and after
We ran a test across 6 synthetic signals × 10 genres:
| Metric | Magic Master | LANDR* | eMastered* |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUFS targeting (error) | 0.6 dB | ~1.5 dB | ~1.2 dB |
| True Peak PASS rate | 100% | ~90% | ~95% |
| Transients preserved | 100% | ~80% | ~85% |
*Estimates based on public reviews and our own testing.
What should you choose?
Choose Magic Master if:
- You want full control over the mastering chain
- You work across many genres (17 presets)
- You need a free plan with no feature restrictions
- You want an API for automation
- You use Telegram for notifications
Choose LANDR if:
- You want a fast result with zero configuration
- You want distribution bundled into one service
- You're willing to pay for simplicity
Choose eMastered if:
- You need reference mastering (matching a reference track)
- You work within a single genre
- You're willing to pay more for EQ matching
Try Magic Master for free: magicmaster.pro/app
Also read
Попробуйте Magic Master
Загрузите трек — готовый мастер за секунды.
Открыть мастеринг → LUFS-анализатор